{"id":222931,"date":"2022-04-07T11:16:33","date_gmt":"2022-04-07T01:16:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/slflawyers.com.au\/?p=222931"},"modified":"2022-04-07T11:16:33","modified_gmt":"2022-04-07T01:16:33","slug":"a-cautionary-tale-for-developers-selling-off-the-plan-apartments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/slflawyers.com.au\/zh\/news\/a-cautionary-tale-for-developers-selling-off-the-plan-apartments\/","title":{"rendered":"A cautionary tale for developers selling off-the-plan apartments"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u5728 Burger & Ors v Longboat Holdings Group2 Pty Ltd <\/em>[2021] VSC 469, two young couples entered into off-the-plan contracts of sale in respect of a two-bedroom (95sqm) apartment in an inner-city Melbourne suburb.\u00a0 Almost three years later when the development was completed, the purchasers discovered that the design and structure of the apartments had been changed multiple times by the developer without them being notified.\u00a0 The changes made by the developer to the apartments included a reduction in the size of the apartments, in particular, to the master bedroom, reducing the apartments\u2019 overall attractiveness and utility of that space.<\/p>\n

SLF Lawyers acted for the purchasers who sought to rescind their contracts on the basis that an amendment to the plan of subdivision had occurred which would materially affect the property.\u00a0 The developer rejected the basis of the purchases\u2019 rescission notices and argued that the contracts remained on foot and settlement was required to take place.<\/p>\n

The purchasers commenced proceedings against the developer by originating motion on 19 April 2021 and asked the Court to determine whether \u2018the amendment to the plan of subdivision materially affected the lot to which the contract relates entitling the plaintiffs to rescind the contract pursuant to section 9AC(2) of the Sale of Land Act 1962\u2019<\/em><\/p>\n

At the heart of these proceedings was whether the changes made by the developer to the\u00a0 apartments were \u2018material changes\u2019.\u00a0 If the answer to that question was \u2018yes\u2019, the purchasers were entitled to rescind their contracts under s 9AC(2) of the Sale of Land Act 1962 <\/em>(SLA<\/strong>).<\/p>\n

The relevant changes to the apartments were:<\/p>\n