{"id":224043,"date":"2023-09-20T08:07:41","date_gmt":"2023-09-19T22:07:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/slflawyers.com.au\/?p=224043"},"modified":"2023-09-20T08:07:41","modified_gmt":"2023-09-19T22:07:41","slug":"the-hidden-cost-of-ignoring-consultation-and-redeployment-redundancy-done-wrong","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/slflawyers.com.au\/it\/news\/the-hidden-cost-of-ignoring-consultation-and-redeployment-redundancy-done-wrong\/","title":{"rendered":"The hidden cost of ignoring consultation and redeployment: Redundancy done wrong"},"content":{"rendered":"

A recent matter in the Fair Work Commission (FWC<\/strong>) has placed the spotlight on employers to ensure that are complying with all procedural and meaningful aspects of redundancy. Employers with domestic and international associated entities, who are implementing redundancies in Australia, now need to consider reasonable redeployment options to affected employees.<\/p>\n

The case of Alesia Khliustova v Isoton Pty Ltd<\/em> [2023] FWC 658, highlights that employers cannot simply just tick the boxes regarding consultation and redeployment during the redundancy process. Commissioner Platt stressed the importance of making a genuine effort to engage with and consult with the employee regarding their redundancy as well as consider reasonable redeployment opportunities especially those in overseas associated entities.<\/p>\n

Alesia Khliustova, a software engineer, found herself facing redundancy when her employer, decided to restructure their operations. However, Ms Khliustova claimed that her employer had failed to comply with the consultation and redeployment requirements outlined in the Fair Work Act 2009 (<\/em>atto<\/strong>)<\/em>. As a result, she brought her case before the FWC, seeking remedies for unfair dismissal.<\/p>\n

Legal background <\/strong><\/p>\n

Section 389 of the Act provides that a \u201cgenuine redundancy\u201d occurs if:<\/p>\n